From 502f96011ea1ab19b5a43630692c478977243c6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: moneromooo-monero Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:42:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] unit_tests: make the density test a bit less stringent It's an inherently random test --- tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp b/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp index 0094fc765..235b1c809 100644 --- a/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp +++ b/tests/unit_tests/output_selection.cpp @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ TEST(select_outputs, density) float chain_ratio = count_chain / (float)n_outs; MDEBUG(count_selected << "/" << NPICKS << " outputs selected in blocks of density " << d << ", " << 100.0f * selected_ratio << "%"); MDEBUG(count_chain << "/" << offsets.size() << " outputs in blocks of density " << d << ", " << 100.0f * chain_ratio << "%"); - ASSERT_LT(fabsf(selected_ratio - chain_ratio), 0.02f); + ASSERT_LT(fabsf(selected_ratio - chain_ratio), 0.025f); } }