We also replace the --fakechain option with an optional structure
containing details about configuration for the core/blockchain,
for test purposes. This seems more future friendly.
7658ac0 blockchain: revert handle_get_objects adding block id on tx not found (moneromooo-monero)
3a0f4d8 berkeleydb: fix delete/free mismatch (moneromooo-monero)
1642be2 minor bugfixes and refactoring (Thomas Winget)
098dcf2 unit_tests: fix mnemonics unit test testing invalid seeds (moneromooo-monero)
119eb10 unit_tests: fix hard fork unit tests and add a test for major too (moneromooo-monero)
64a2aa3 hardfork: allow passing chain height in get(height) for convenience (moneromooo-monero)
Some word triplets, such as "mugged names nail", are not valid
results from any 32 bit value. If used to decode a 32 bit value,
the result will therefore encode to a different word triplet.
Fix this by using random words converted from an actual random
bitstring, ensuring we always get valid triplets.
Some tests assume the first output in a transaction goes to the recipient.
However, it can be the change. When it is, the recipient's keys will not
recognize this output. To fix this, we send all we have, to ensure there
is no change, and the first output goes to the recipient.
I'm not sure why this worked with Cryptonote. The tests sent 17 coins,
which seems way smaller than the first Bytecoin block reward, so there
would have been change too. Maybe outputs were not shuffled originally.
Block reward may now be less than the full amount allowed.
This was breaking the bitflipping test.
We now keep track of whether a block which was accepted by the core
has a lower than allowed block reward, and allow this in the test.
They were trying to send too much monero, and thus failing.
The parameters were set in such a way that the (simple) output
gathering code could fulfill them for 4 block rewards for the
original Bytecoin emission, but that does not work with monero
so we need to use smaller values.
The current monero consensus uses 0.01 per kB fees, so use enough
for 2 kB transactions for now. It'll probably have to be either
bumped further or changed to calculate the proper fee.
The core tests use the blockchain, and reset it to be able
to add test data to it. This does not play nice with the
databases, since those will save that data without an explicit
save call.
We add a fakechain flag that the tests will set, which tells
the core and blockchain code to use a separate database, as
well as skip a few things like checkpoints and fixup, which
only make sense for real data.
Also add some more tests, and rename some instances of
"version" and "add" for clarity.
NOTE: the starting height values are sometimes wrong.
I suspect this is due to the hard fork reorg code being
buggy, since they're good when syncing after the fact.
However, they're not actually used by the consensus code,
so I'm ignoring this for now, but this needs debugging.
The last relayed time of a transaction is maintained, and
transactions will be relayed again if they are still in the
pool after a certain amount of time, which increases with
the transaction's age. All such transactions are resent,
whether or not they originated on the local node.
baf101e More changes for 2-min blocks Use the correct block time for realtime fuzz on locktime Use the correct block time to calculate next_difficulty on alt chains (will not work as-is with voting) Lock unit tests to original block time for now (Javier Smooth)
4fea1a5 Adjust difficulty target (2 min) and full reward zone (60 kbytes) for block version 2 (Javier Smooth)
Use the correct block time for realtime fuzz on locktime
Use the correct block time to calculate next_difficulty on alt chains (will not work as-is with voting)
Lock unit tests to original block time for now
Using major version would cause older daemons to reject those
blocks as they fail to deserialize blocks with a major version
which is not 1. There is no such restriction on the minor
version, so switching allows older daemons to coexist with
newer ones till the actual fork date, when most will hopefully
have updated already.
Also, for the same reason, we consider a vote for 0 to be a
vote for 1, since older daemons set minor version to 0.
This allows knowing the hard fork a block must obey in order to be
added to the blockchain. The previous semantics would use that new
block's version vote to determine this hard fork, which made it
impossible to use the rules to validate transactions entering the
tx pool (and made it impossible to validate a block before adding
it to the blockchain).
moneromooo-monero
Riccardo Spagni
me0wmix
Howard Chu
Javier Smooth