Alice was attempting to create a new event loop using the same listen addr as the old one which was still running. This commit aborts the event loop before creating a new one.
Upgrade bitcoin harness dependency to latest commit
Upgrade backoff to fix failing tests. The previous version of backoff had a broken version of the retry function. Upgraded to a newer comit which fixes this problem.
Upgrade hyper to 0.14 as the 0.13 was bringing in tokio 0.2.24
Upgraded bitcoin harness to version that uses tokio 1.0 and reqwest 0.11
Upgrade reqwest to 0.11. Reqwest 0.11 uses tokio 1.0
Upgrade libp2p to 0.34 in preparation for tokio 1.0 upgrade
As per the proposed changed in the sequence diagram.
The aim is to have a unique terminology per message instead of having
the same name for 2 consequent messages that share the same behaviour.
Note that the aim is to remove the shared `RequestResponse` behaviours.
Rust fmt automatically groups the imports (from top to bottom) as `pub use` `use crate` and `use`.
There is no need to introduce sections which cause annoyance when auto importing using the IDE.
149: Fix Alice redeem scenario r=da-kami a=da-kami
Follow up of #144, partial fix of https://github.com/comit-network/xmr-btc-swap/issues/137
Fix Alice redeem scenario
- Properly check the timelocks before trying to redeem
- Distinguish different failure scenarios and reactions to it.
- if we fail to construct the redeem transaction: wait for cancel.
- if we fail to publish the redeem transaction: wait for cancel but let the user know that restarting the application will result in retrying to publish the tx.
- if we succeed to publish the tx but then fail when waiting for finality, print error to the user (secreat already leaked, the user has to check manually if the tx was included)
Co-authored-by: Daniel Karzel <daniel@comit.network>
- Properly check the timelocks before trying to redeem
- Distinguish different failure scenarios and reactions to it.
- if we fail to construct the redeem transaction: wait for cancel.
- if we fail to publish the redeem transaction: wait for cancel but let the user know that restarting the application will result in retrying to publish the tx.
- if we succeed to publish the tx but then fail when waiting for finality, print error to the user (secreat already leaked, the user has to check manually if the tx was included)
This is not really a factory as a factory design pattern is about
producing several instances.
In the current usage, we are only interested in one swap instance. Once
the swap instance is created, the factory becomes useless. Hence, it is
more of a builder pattern.
Franck Royer
rishflab
Daniel Karzel
bors[bot]