1. We can generalize the signing interface by passing a PSBT in
instead of the `TxLock` transaction.
2. Knowing the transaction ID of a transaction that we are about
to sign is not very useful. Instead, it is much more useful to know
what failed. Hence we add a `.context` to the call of `sign_and_finalize`.
3. In case the signing succeeds, we will immediately broadcast it
afterwards. The new broadcasting interface will tell us that we broadcasted
the "lock" transaction.
We eliminate unnecessary layers of indirection for broadcasting logic
and force our callers to provide us with the `kind` of transaction
that we are publishing.
Eventually, we can replace this string with some type-system magic
we can derive the name from the actual transaction. For now, we just
require the caller to duplicate this information because it is faster
and good enough TM.
This struct is a wallet. The only thing it can meaningfully broadcast
are transactions. The fact that they have to be signed for that is
implied. You cannot broadcast unsigned transactions.
Abstracting over the individual bits of functionality of the wallet
does have its place, especially if one wants to keep a separation
of an abstract protocol library that other people can use with their
own wallets.
However, at the moment, the traits only cause unnecessary friction.
We can always add such abstraction layers again once we need them.
These traits were only used once within the `TxLock` constructor.
Looking at the rest of the codebase, we don't really seem to follow
any abstractions here where the protocol shouldn't know about the
exact types that is being passed in.
As such, these types are just noise and might as well be removed in
favor of simplicity.
The only reason we need this argument is because we need to access
the output descriptor. We can save that one ahead of time at when
we construct the type.
For transitioning to state4 we either go into a redeem or a cancellation scenario.
The function name state4 is misleading, because it is only used for cancellation scenarios.
To achieve this we also:
- upgrade rust-bitcoin to 0.26
- upgrade bitcoin-harness to latest version (which also depends bitcoin 0.26)
- upgrade to latest edcsa-fun
- replace cross_curve_dleq proof with sigma_fun (to avoid an upgrade dance over there)
As per the proposed changed in the sequence diagram.
The aim is to have a unique terminology per message instead of having
the same name for 2 consequent messages that share the same behaviour.
Note that the aim is to remove the shared `RequestResponse` behaviours.
Rust fmt automatically groups the imports (from top to bottom) as `pub use` `use crate` and `use`.
There is no need to introduce sections which cause annoyance when auto importing using the IDE.
Created network, storage and protocol modules. Organised
files into the modules where the belong.
xmr_btc crate moved into isolated modulein swap crate.
Remove the xmr_btc module and integrate into swap crate.
Consolidate message related code
Reorganise imports
Remove unused parent Message enum
Remove unused parent State enum
Remove unused dependencies from Cargo.toml
Daniel Karzel
Thomas Eizinger
rishflab
Franck Royer